« Kojo Griffin Selected for Seville Biennial | Main | Inside Roger Ballen's Shadow Chamber »

April 12, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ffcbe53ef00d834820c4d53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 99 cent for $1.5 million:

Comments

Steve Roach

I want that! Seems like an ambitious estimate, but I'd take this Gursky over the Richard Prince that sold for $1.2M! Do you know when Serpentine Gallery will release information on the Thomas Demand edition??? Their Ellsworth Kelly one was little and expensive! -- Steve

Erik Schneider

Serpentine will list the info on the Demand the day the show opens.

Todd W.

I was at MoMA this weekend and this image was used on the 2001 exhibition poster - now on sale 1/2 price!

While in the current market, it's probably a sure thing to hit the estimate, in terms of historical importance and rarity, this image is nothing like the recent Steichen sale and I really can't believe it would truly be worth $1MM+. I'd have to agree with the New York article. This image will sell for signicantly less than $1MM 5 years hence.

Question - would you give ANY chance to this image falling short of its estimate and initiating the much discussed art market crash?

Erik Schneider

There's always a chance, but it only takes two deep pocketed collectors who really want the work to push it above the low estimate and I have to believe that there are two such people out there!

QT Luong

This would be unprecedented for a contemporary photograph. Other images of Gursky can be bought for four figure amounts.

The comments to this entry are closed.